With the boys no!!!
Legislators say it is because this already exists for many years under the motto of (consensual sex) and that the most 'reasonable' thing to do in line with times from this peculiar point of view is to legalize it, they don't liken this language to that of prostitution legalization, things exist, they are there, have always existed so let's legalize it, but it turns out that there is also hunger all over the world, since long ago, in Latin America, Africa, Asia and other regions of the world, following the reasoning of Peruvian legislators and lawmakers who approved what they call the law we could use this argument to regulate who goes hungry and who doesn't based on the fact that we cannot or do not want to eradicate it entirely or how much time is left for someone to go hungry before some kind of help arrives. Europe is happy with this measure already having what they wanted now only missing is for it to spread to the rest of hungry and miserable Latin America with the help of legislators like those in Peru in other countries that won't be very difficult to achieve. The legalization of prostitution of poorer women and children will be a piece of cake after that. Child abuse refers to any sexual act performed by an adult on a minor, with or without consent from the minor, Child abuse is considered a criminal act by international legislation and most modern countries.
At 14 years old, there is no recognition in Peru of the obligation that is imposed, disguised as a right, to vote in Peru just like in other countries in the region, I mean what they are promoting as legitimate is this evident violation of the rights of the minor recorded in international and national statutes. They're not covering a minor's right as they pretend if not the opposite, the adult's right not to be punished whether man or woman for having sexual relations with a minor, but they accommodate it well just like always and sounds coherent only because people don't have yet the media power to deny this. You have neither right nor obligation to vote nor are you recognized as self-sufficient to exercise this at 14 years old, how can one argue self-sufficiency for sex with adults at that age arguing 'mutual consent' and even worse maturity to exercise your right to procreation when there is no recognition of intellectual maturity for voting which in this case is compulsory? And if not, it's pure corruption and so we should understand.But we are all so convinced in the entire world that these people in power have been elected by our vote and not because there are no valid options to get rid of them all, that is why we do not fight against this, it is actually pure impotence and disappointment and desperation. But nothing good can come out of this.
The activists who claim that prostitution is pure violation, harassment, and abuse have always been right, it's just that it's becoming more evident every day. It would be very important to know how many female lawmakers from these so-called feminist groups that supposedly advocate for women's and children's rights were involved in this decision, their names and respective positions, but that would already be asking too much, since it violates the law of privacy of personal data in Peru and is against good customs. The pedophiles by excellence of the Catholic Church have rushed to declare the law as unconstitutional, but massive manifestations are not expected.
The following headline can be found by the thousands on the internet.
'It's absurd to say that minors have been left at the mercy of violators.'
It sounds like a solid argument, because what has actually happened in Peru is that any adult pedophile or not can now use the body of a minor without fear of the law. The new law approved in Peru legalizes sex with children from 14 years old if there is mutual consent, the rest do it out of hunger, poverty, and need, and we all know this, one, two, or three years less don't matter, the pedophiles and violators will always have the opportunity to argue that the girl was very well developed and seemed like 14, the rest would be completed with laziness, public corruption, and police brutality. The Catholic Church is breaking books, burning art works, or marching through the streets in fulminates of protest. It hasn't been seen, that's because the case isn't worth it.
Legislators say it is because this already exists for many years under the motto of (consensual sex) and that the most 'reasonable' thing to do in line with times from this peculiar point of view is to legalize it, they don't liken this language to that of prostitution legalization, things exist, they are there, have always existed so let's legalize it, but it turns out that there is also hunger all over the world, since long ago, in Latin America, Africa, Asia and other regions of the world, following the reasoning of Peruvian legislators and lawmakers who approved what they call the law we could use this argument to regulate who goes hungry and who doesn't based on the fact that we cannot or do not want to eradicate it entirely or how much time is left for someone to go hungry before some kind of help arrives. Europe is happy with this measure already having what they wanted now only missing is for it to spread to the rest of hungry and miserable Latin America with the help of legislators like those in Peru in other countries that won't be very difficult to achieve. The legalization of prostitution of poorer women and children will be a piece of cake after that. Child abuse refers to any sexual act performed by an adult on a minor, with or without consent from the minor, Child abuse is considered a criminal act by international legislation and most modern countries.
At 14 years old, there is no recognition in Peru of the obligation that is imposed, disguised as a right, to vote in Peru just like in other countries in the region, I mean what they are promoting as legitimate is this evident violation of the rights of the minor recorded in international and national statutes. They're not covering a minor's right as they pretend if not the opposite, the adult's right not to be punished whether man or woman for having sexual relations with a minor, but they accommodate it well just like always and sounds coherent only because people don't have yet the media power to deny this. You have neither right nor obligation to vote nor are you recognized as self-sufficient to exercise this at 14 years old, how can one argue self-sufficiency for sex with adults at that age arguing 'mutual consent' and even worse maturity to exercise your right to procreation when there is no recognition of intellectual maturity for voting which in this case is compulsory? And if not, it's pure corruption and so we should understand.But we are all so convinced in the entire world that these people in power have been elected by our vote and not because there are no valid options to get rid of them all, that is why we do not fight against this, it is actually pure impotence and disappointment and desperation. But nothing good can come out of this.The activists who claim that prostitution is pure violation, harassment, and abuse have always been right, it's just that it's becoming more evident every day. It would be very important to know how many female lawmakers from these so-called feminist groups that supposedly advocate for women's and children's rights were involved in this decision, their names and respective positions, but that would already be asking too much, since it violates the law of privacy of personal data in Peru and is against good customs. The pedophiles by excellence of the Catholic Church have rushed to declare the law as unconstitutional, but massive manifestations are not expected.
The following headline can be found by the thousands on the internet.
'It's absurd to say that minors have been left at the mercy of violators.'
It sounds like a solid argument, because what has actually happened in Peru is that any adult pedophile or not can now use the body of a minor without fear of the law. The new law approved in Peru legalizes sex with children from 14 years old if there is mutual consent, the rest do it out of hunger, poverty, and need, and we all know this, one, two, or three years less don't matter, the pedophiles and violators will always have the opportunity to argue that the girl was very well developed and seemed like 14, the rest would be completed with laziness, public corruption, and police brutality. The Catholic Church is breaking books, burning art works, or marching through the streets in fulminates of protest. It hasn't been seen, that's because the case isn't worth it.
Comentarios Destacados
9 comentários - Danger. Peru legalizes pedophilia